“The implications of AI for the law are only beginning to be explored.” United States v. Heppner, 820 F. Supp. 3d 292, 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2026).  For decades, lawyers have routinely cautioned clients not to discuss their cases with family members, friends, coworkers, or strangers. The reason is apparent: voluntary disclosure of confidential communications to a third party may destroy attorney-client privilege. Now, lawyers may need to add a new warning to that list: do not discuss your case with artificial intelligence. Ashley Goins takes a look at the issue in this Stites & Harbison Client Alert.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to perform tasks related to construction projects, including structural calculations, cost estimates, schedules, code compliance checks, and various other functions. Yet none of the industry’s standard contract templates contain provisions prescribing responsible use of AI or allocating potential liability that could result from its use. In addition, many property and casualty insurers have issued standardized AI exclusions that became effective in policies renewing on or after January 1, 2026. Therefore, it is advisable to include language in construction contracts that targets the use of artificial intelligence. Construction attorney Greg Parsons takes a look at this issue in this Stites & Harbison Client Alert.