Hartford, CT

71 Raymond Road

West Hartford,

CT

06107

With a focus on client needs and an expanding intellectual property practice, Stites & Harbison established the Hartford, CT office in September 2024.

Hartford Office Executive Member

Hartford, CT

Grant

M.

Ehrlich

Ph.D.

Find an Attorney

View all attorneys for this office

Benchmark Litigation has named Stites & Harbison, PLLC as Litigation Firm of the Year for Kentucky at its 2025 Benchmark US Awards Gala. This is the fifth time Stites & Harbison has received the honor.

Firm Honored for Fifth Time LOUISVILLE, Ky.—Benchmark Litigation has named Stites & Harbison, PLLC as Litigation Firm of the Year for Kentucky at its 2025 Benchmark US Awards Gala. This is the fifth time Stites & Harbison has received the honor. “We are honored to be recognized by Benchmark Litigation...
by Stites & Harbison, PLLC

Stites & Harbison, PLLC welcomes attorney Nancy Kennedy to the Hartford, Conn., office. Kennedy joins the Intellectual Property & Technology Service Group as a Member (Partner).

HARTFORD, Conn.—Stites & Harbison, PLLC welcomes attorney Nancy Kennedy to the Hartford, Conn., office. Kennedy joins the Intellectual Property & Technology Service Group as a Member (Partner). “We are very happy to have Nancy join our intellectual property team,” stated Terry L. Wright, Chair of the Intellectual Property & Technology...
by Stites & Harbison, PLLC

Georgia’s Governor Brian Kemp made no secret that he would push for ambitious tort reform as part of this year’s state legislative agenda. Two Senate bills successfully made it through the session and await the Governor’s signature. The bills contain measures, which proponents and sponsors suggested were necessary to combat nuclear verdicts, reduce the costs of litigation, and control rising insurance premiums. Shannon Sprinkle and Evan Elam take a look at the bills in this Stites & Harbison Client Alert.

Georgia’s Governor Brian Kemp made no secret that he would push for ambitious tort reform as part of this year’s state legislative agenda. Two Senate bills successfully made it through the session and await the Governor’s signature. The bills contain measures, which proponents and sponsors suggested were necessary to combat...

On April 1, 2025, in Lynwood Pickens v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified what it means to pay a salary on a “weekly basis” under federal regulation 29 C.F.R. § 541.602(a) for purposes of classifying an employee as exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In a divided opinion, the Sixth Circuit held that to be paid on a “weekly basis” means that an employee is paid for “a regular week’s worth of work.” As a result, the court held that an employer did not pay an employee on a “weekly basis”—and therefore owed the employee overtime—when the weekly guaranteed pay to the employee was only the equivalent of one day’s pay and the employee was paid an hourly rate for every hour worked beyond the first eight hours in the week.

On April 1, 2025, in Lynwood Pickens v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified what it means to pay a salary on a “weekly basis” under federal regulation 29 C.F.R. § 541.602(a) for purposes of classifying an employee as exempt from overtime under the Fair...
BESbswy