While many legislative proposals have stalled in Congress, President Obama has moved forward with a variety of labor and employment initiatives by means of Executive Orders. Such orders are limited to the regulation of "federal contractors" and by their own terms. Whether banks and their employees are covered depends on a variety of factors.
Articles, Books & Whitepapers
Colorado has legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use. Kentucky has legalized the production of industrial hemp. Both substances are derived from the same species, cannabis sativa l., which Congress has declared unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) .
No, not potato chips, micro-chips! Beginning October 1, 2015, merchants and card-issuers may be liable for fraudulent transactions, depending on who’s the #LeastTechSavvy. At present, credit card companies, for the most part, cover the costs of counterfeit transactions when they occur over their networks. However, after October 1, Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express have announced that whichever party has not updated their technology to meet the new EMV or Chip and Pin cards will be responsible for the cost of the fraudulent transaction.
Extreme sports are increasingly popular in the U.S., and participation is growing. "Extreme" means different things to different people. But participation is not only up in sports such as mountain biking and snowboarding, more people also are bungee jumping, hang gliding, wind surfing and rock climbing. As more Americans become involved in hazardous recreation, the number of personal injuries is also rising, especially among minors. With injuries comes litigation, of course, and the popularity of extreme sports raises challenging questions of liability.
In today’s global economy, product manufacturers resource materials and components, sell their products, and expose themselves to potential litigation in countries far from the manufacturer’s home base. While clients may understand—though they may not like—their obligations to participate in discovery as a party to a products liability dispute, they also may be subject to the same discovery requirements even though they are not a party in matters pending in foreign jurisdictions. One avenue to compel discovery in the United States for use in proceedings in foreign jurisdictions is 28 U.S.C. section 1782.
Kentucky was the 47th state to pass cybersecurity legislation with the 2014 creation of state law KRS 365.732 in 2014.
During February of this year, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals joined the majority of circuits and held that the disclosure of information to the government during an audit or investigation does not constitute a “public disclosure” and subsequently does not create a jurisdictional bar to a qui tam action under the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”). The Court’s decision in United States ex rel. Whipple v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority allowed the plaintiff to proceed with his case on remand and has the potential to invite more FCA qui tam actions given the narrow interpretation given to the public disclosure bar.
HR can be an important gatekeeper in protecting a company's intellectual property – for employees and contractors alike. Intellectual property includes trade secrets and proprietary information (such as customer lists, formulas and manufacturing processes), copyrights (such as software, photographs, videos, web content and manuals), and patentable inventions (such as a medical device, machine, chemical compound, business method or even a product design).
Rebecca McKelvey Castañeda was awarded the Harris Gilbert Pro Bono Volunteer of the Year award for 2014 by the Tennessee Bar Association.
As the saying goes, "Be careful what you wish for; you might get it." This describes the current state of biofuels. The appealing concept of biofuels is supported by well-meaning environmental advocates, business interests, and governmental policy, but if we don't make wise choices, then the reality may not be all that we wished for.
Bob Connolly takes over as Chairman of Stites & Harbison, PLLC, beginning in January 2015.
In 1999, by a six to three majority, the United States Supreme Court issued a seminal decision in Olmstead v. L.C., which involved the application of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Olmstead concerned several intellectually disabled individuals (“individuals”) who were admitted to a Georgia hospital but not timely discharged from the hospital although their treatment professionals agreed that they could be cared for safely in the community.
The voice of business in political and regulatory issues has been a hot button topic since the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. Public policy battles will continue whether your corporation is active or not, and avoiding the debate may not be an option. What does your board need to know about the company's involvement in PACs, lobbying, and all those other messy necessities of modern policital life?
If you practice in federal court, pay close attention to the changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure arriving in 2015. Implementing the so-called “Duke Rules Package” developed at a 2010 Federal Rules Advisory Committee meeting held at Duke University, upcoming changes recommended by the Advisory Committee focus on three main areas: (1) early judicial case management; (2) the scope of discovery and (3) litigants’ failure to preserve electronically stored information.
This article appeared as a Georgia Casenote on the website of the Construction Litigation Committee of the Litigation Section of the American Bar Association and is reprinted with their permission.
DRI member, John Tate, of Stites & Harbison, PLLC, won a defense verdict for Leatt Corporation in Scarvelli v. Leatt Corporation (Case No. 1:12-CV-00483), a product liability lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio after a two-week trial ending April 17, 2014.
Patent infringement litigation is expensive, and the cost of that litigation can make or break a company. By the same token, even our nation’s largest and healthiest companies are spending millions of dollars on arguably meritless patent litigation brought by non-practicing entitites and, at the end of the case, they have nothing to show for it but a hefty legal bill. The Patent Act allows a successful party to recover its attorney fee expenses from the other party under certain circumstances.
A February 11, 2014, opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit adds further support for contractors’ reliance on owner provided geotechnical data. The decision dealt, in part, with the Differing Site Conditions clause in the federal contract, 40 CFR 52.236-2. Since many other standard contracts employ similar language in their Differing Site Condition clause, the decision may have some impact beyond federal contracts
In recent years, lenders have been forced to defend a record number of so-called “wrongful foreclosure” lawsuits. However, several Tennessee court rulings issued this year indicate that…
This article appeared in Norton Bankruptcy Law Adviser and is reprinted with their permission.
In recent years, many employers have instituted employee wellness programs to encourage good health, lower medical costs, and improve employee productivity and attendance. Initially, large employers were the primary proponents of wellness plans, but now many small and mid-sized companies sponsor wellness programs. Wellness programs can take many forms. Some focus more on disease management while others focus more on healthy lifestyles and habits.
Construction projects are like onions—and ogers—they have many layers. On a typical construction project an owner will contract with a general contractor who will then contract with subcontractors, who may themselves contract with even lower tier subcontractors. Ultimately, there tend to be many intermediaries between subcontractors doing the work and owners who benefit by the work on construction projects. One problem that results from this for subcontractors is how they ensure payment for their work if the contractor with whom they have contracted refuses to pay?
The America Invents Act, enacted Sept. 16, 2011. makes the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (“EDVA”) a primary trial court for challenging decisions of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Patent Office.
A long-standing adage in the healthcare industry is "first, do no harm." When it comes to protecting the environment, this industry must take this challenge to heart. As a group, the healthcare industry generates over two million tons of waste annually.
The fundamental feature of a class action is that the claims are such that resolving those claims for one plaintiff effectively would resolve those claims for others who have the same claims against the defendant. Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and its state equivalents, require proof of several elements designed to help determine whether this feature is present in a given case.
As a busy lawyer and father of seven young children, I know that it takes the right team to achieve success at work and home. Whether you are talking about adjusting to the challenging healthcare environment with new regulations and technologies, or fostering good relationships with your colleagues, staff, family and friends, anyone can find the right balance by planning ahead and using some best practices.
Recently, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued its Enforcement Guidance (Guidance) regarding employer use of arrest and conviction records in employment decisions. The Guidance highlights the EEOC's approach to the use of criminal records in background checks, but should not be considered by an employer in a vacuum.
Merger and acquisition (M&A) activity in the healthcare field, including the long-term care sector, has been strong, with high reported deal volume and values. The dynamic created by healthcare reform in the U.S. is certainly a major force behind the move to greater consolidation, as well as factors such as the uncertainty resulting from downward pressure on reimbursement, challenging economic conditions, the looming fiscal cliff and the possibility of a less favorable future tax environment.
Blaine Early and Kathryn Taylor (a summer associate with the firm) explore how regulators, water users, legislators, and the courts are responding to severe droughts in west Texas and the Southeastern United States by allocating water among competing users, incentivizing conservation, or, in an example of the law of unintended consequences, triggering greater depletion of limited groundwater reserves. The authors consider the economic and environmental consequences of drought in the two regions and posit that Georgia legislators should consider a system such as that adopted by Texas, allowing counties and cities to provide financial incentives for rainwater harvesting.
Ken Gish, along with Elizabeth Thomas and Kari Vander with K&L Gates, LLP, review the Supreme Court's February 2012 decision in PPL Montana, LLC v. State of Montana and present an enlightening summary of the distinction between federal navigability tests for the purposes of (1) establishing title to the beds of water bodies, (2) determining the extent of federal regulatory jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause, and (3) determining the extent of admiralty jurisdiction. To the confusion of many courts and practitioners, the test for navigability is applied differently in each of these distinct types of cases.